National Center for Biomedical Research Information
Biomedical Literature & Research Abstracts
Advanced SearchBrowse JournalsMeSH IndexClinical TrialsAbout
Citation
Gut
Vol. 74pp. 2156-21702025
PMID: 39567890

Gut Microbiome Modulation in Irritable Bowel Syndrome: A Systematic Review of Probiotics, Prebiotics, and Fecal Microbiota Transplantation

Fernandez-Garcia M, Al-Hassan R
Department of Clinical Nutrition, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
Systematic Review ·Gastroenterology ·December 5, 2025
Search Strategy
Systematic search of PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library from January 2015 through September 2025. Included randomized controlled trials of microbiome-targeted interventions in adults meeting Rome IV criteria for IBS.
Microbiome culture analysis
16:9
Microbiome culture analysis — ClinicalRef / Illustration

Background

Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) affects approximately 11% of the global population and is increasingly recognized as a disorder of gut-brain interaction with altered intestinal microbiota. Microbiome-targeted therapies including probiotics, prebiotics, synbiotics, and fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) have been proposed as treatment strategies. However, evidence remains fragmented and heterogeneous, complicating clinical decision-making.

Methods

We conducted a systematic review following PRISMA 2020 guidelines. Databases including PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched from January 2015 through September 2025. Eligible studies were randomized controlled trials evaluating microbiome-targeted interventions in adults meeting Rome IV criteria for IBS, with a minimum treatment duration of 4 weeks. Primary outcomes were global IBS symptom improvement and abdominal pain severity. Quality assessment was performed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 tool.

Results

Forty-seven randomized controlled trials (n=8,912 participants) met inclusion criteria. For probiotics, 31 trials demonstrated that multi-strain formulations containing Bifidobacterium longum, Lactobacillus acidophilus, and Lactobacillus plantarum showed the most consistent benefit, with pooled relative risk of global symptom improvement of 1.44 (95% CI, 1.28-1.62). Single-strain probiotics showed variable results. For prebiotics, 8 trials of partially hydrolyzed guar gum and galactooligosaccharides showed modest improvement in bloating scores but inconsistent effects on overall symptoms. For FMT, 8 trials showed conflicting results, with response rates ranging from 24% to 65%, likely reflecting heterogeneity in donor selection, delivery method, and patient selection. Adverse events across all interventions were generally mild and gastrointestinal in nature.

Conclusions

Multi-strain probiotic formulations demonstrate the most robust evidence for symptom management in IBS. FMT shows promise but requires standardization of protocols and better patient selection criteria before clinical implementation can be recommended.

Conclusion

Multi-strain probiotics containing Bifidobacterium and Lactobacillus species show the most consistent evidence for symptom improvement in IBS, while fecal microbiota transplantation results remain inconclusive and require further investigation.

Funding: UK Medical Research Council Grant MR/T025573/1
Conflict of Interest: The authors declare no competing interests.